A controversial new article resurrects decades-old theories about President John F. Kennedy's assassination, suggesting government involvement and multiple shooters.

According to a Daily Mail report, writer Maureen Callahan claims JFK's assassination was an "inside job" with two shooters, challenging the Warren Commission's official findings that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone.

Callahan's article, featured in the Daily Mail, coincides with President Trump's recent executive order declassifying JFK files, which allegedly led to the discovery of 2,400 more files containing 14,000 "lost" pages. This renewed examination of the November 22, 1963 assassination comes amid longstanding skepticism about the government's version of events, with Callahan suggesting that FBI and CIA involvement might explain why certain files remained classified for six decades.

Evidence challenging official narrative surfaces

The article highlights several inconsistencies in the Warren Commission's findings, particularly focusing on the controversial "magic bullet" theory. According to Callahan, this theory – which suggests a single bullet caused multiple wounds to both Kennedy and Texas Governor John Connally – has been widely criticized by skeptics. Governor Connally himself remained unconvinced until his death in 1993, stating he did not believe he and JFK had been hit by the same bullet.

Callahan points to the Zapruder film as crucial evidence contradicting the official narrative. This 26.6-second amateur footage, which wasn't publicly shown until 1975 (twelve years after the assassination), appears to show Kennedy's head snapping backward after being struck – suggesting a shot from the front rather than from behind where Oswald was positioned. This observation supports what became known as the "grassy knoll" theory, proposing a second shooter fired the fatal shot from a concealed position.

The article also questions the suspicious circumstances surrounding Oswald's killing. Jack Ruby, a nightclub owner with alleged mob connections, shot Oswald at point-blank range during a televised police transfer just two days after Kennedy's assassination. Callahan notes that the Warren Commission inexplicably dismissed Ruby's ties to organized crime, accepting his claim that he acted alone out of patriotic duty.

Kennedy family secrets and government motives

Callahan's article delves into Kennedy's personal life, portraying him as a "promiscuous drug and sex addict" whose behavior potentially compromised national security. She claims JFK's recklessness extended to his handling of diplomatic relations, particularly during his meeting with Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev, which by Kennedy's own admission was "the worst thing in my life."

The report connects FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to both the Kennedy family and Marilyn Monroe. According to Callahan, Hoover – described as a "secret cross-dresser" – maintained extensive files on Kennedy, his brother Robert, and Monroe, who allegedly had simultaneous sexual relationships with both Kennedy brothers. The article suggests Monroe's death in 1962, officially ruled a suicide, might have connections to the Kennedys.

Callahan proposes several potential motives for Kennedy's assassination, including retaliation from organized crime figures who had helped Kennedy win the 1960 election only to face prosecution from Robert Kennedy's Justice Department. She also suggests Kennedy's handling of the Bay of Pigs fiasco and Cuban Missile Crisis might have made him a liability to national security interests.

Transparency demand grows amid skepticism

Callahan argues that the continued classification of assassination documents only fuels public distrust in government institutions. She asserts that most Americans already believe government agencies were involved in either the assassination or its cover-up. This widespread skepticism, according to Callahan, has contributed to a culture of distrust toward official narratives on various issues.

The article connects historical government secrecy to modern skepticism about official accounts of various events. Callahan suggests that full transparency regarding the Kennedy assassination files would be "the healthiest thing the US government has ever done for its people." She portrays the American public as ready to confront whatever truths might emerge from the declassified documents.

Callahan concludes with a rhetorical question about the government's willingness to trust its citizens with the truth, implying that continued secrecy serves only to protect those involved in wrongdoing rather than legitimate national security interests. She suggests that after six decades, the threat to national security is likely not foreign adversaries but the revelation of domestic agencies' involvement in the president's death.

Assassination theories persist despite decades

The controversy surrounding Kennedy's assassination has maintained remarkable staying power in American culture. Callahan's article is part of a longstanding tradition of questioning the official narrative, which began almost immediately after the Warren Commission published its findings in 1964. The persistence of these theories reflects both the traumatic impact of the assassination on the national psyche and genuine inconsistencies in the evidence.

According to the article, President Trump's executive order to declassify the remaining JFK files came just four days after his inauguration in January 2025. This follows an unfulfilled promise from his first term, when he ultimately decided against full disclosure in 2018, citing "grave" threats to national security. The timing of this renewed effort coincides with the discovery of thousands of previously unknown documents.

Callahan's piece reflects a belief that government transparency is essential for rebuilding public trust. She suggests that continued secrecy only reinforces conspiracy theories rather than dispelling them, creating a cycle of increasing skepticism toward official explanations across many domains of public life.

Why This Story Matters

Understanding the JFK assassination is vital because it reflects on governmental transparency and helps us learn how narratives are shaped. It teaches us about the power of public perception and the necessity for critical questioning in the face of official accounts. Moreover, this formative event helps us appreciate the impact of historical events on national policy and identity.

Unresolved questions linger decades later

A controversial news article has revived long-debated theories about President John F. Kennedy's assassination, suggesting government involvement and the presence of two shooters. The Daily Mail piece by writer Maureen Callahan challenges the Warren Commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he shot Kennedy in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

The article connects with President Trump's recent executive order to declassify remaining JFK files, which reportedly led to the discovery of 2,400 additional files. Callahan questions why documents would remain classified for over 60 years unless they contained evidence of government involvement in the assassination, suggesting that agencies like the FBI and CIA might have participated in either the killing or its cover-up.