Monday, October 13, 2025
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
 October 10, 2025

Comey pleads not guilty in charges pushed by Trump

Former FBI Director James Comey entered a not guilty plea Wednesday at his arraignment in Alexandria, Virginia.

Comey faces two federal charges, including making a false statement and obstruction of a congressional proceeding, NBC News reported. The indictment came after President Donald Trump publicly called for his prosecution on social media.

Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald represented Comey during the brief court appearance and waived the reading of the indictment. Fitzgerald also requested a jury trial for his client.

Charges Stem from Congressional Testimony

A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia handed down the indictment last month against the former FBI chief. Trump had dismissed Comey from his position during the president's first term in office.

The prosecution alleges Comey lied to Congress about authorizing a third party to speak anonymously to media outlets about an FBI investigation. Comey testified in 2017 that he did not authorize any leaks related to an investigation.

He reiterated his stance in 2020 testimony before the Senate, stating he stood by his previous statements. The charges center on whether Comey was truthful about his role in media disclosures.

Presidential Pressure Preceded the Indictment

Trump posted on his social media platform days before the indictment, urging Attorney General Pam Bondi to charge Comey. The president wrote that action could not be delayed any longer.

Comey, a registered Republican who served in the Justice Department under President George W. Bush, drew Trump's anger after his actions led to special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation. That probe examined Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Trump successfully pressured the acting head of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia to resign. He then appointed Lindsey Halligan, his former personal attorney, to lead the office despite her lack of prosecutorial experience.

Defense Plans Multiple Legal Challenges

The trial has been scheduled for January 5 with an expected duration of two to three days. Comey's legal team informed the judge that they will file motions challenging the charges as vindictive and selective prosecution.

Fitzgerald announced plans to challenge Halligan's appointment as U.S. attorney, calling it unlawful. The defense attorney also indicated they would file motions regarding alleged grand jury abuse and outrageous government conduct.

Halligan presented the case to the grand jury alone, an unusual practice in federal prosecutions. Two prosecutors from a U.S. attorney's office in North Carolina, Nathaniel Lemons and Gabriel J. Diaz, were later added to the case.

Lessons to Learn

Every criminal case offers insights into how individuals, institutions, and governments operate—and how the public can respond with awareness and caution:

1. Scrutiny of legal authority appointments matters. Citizens should monitor who is appointed to key leadership roles within government agencies, particularly when those appointees have personal or political ties that may influence major proceedings.

2. Public campaigns can impact legal outcomes. Political figures using public platforms to push for criminal charges can raise alarms about fairness. It's important to rely on due process and judicial systems, not social media verdicts.

3. Legal accountability should be applied evenly. Regardless of status or occupation, accountability under the law should be consistent—but selective or retaliatory application of justice can damage public trust and invite abuse.

Why This Story Matters

This case strikes at the heart of constitutional democracy by raising questions about whether justice is being served or manipulated. Cases involving political actors and public institutions test the integrity of American legal frameworks. The outcome of Comey's trial could impact public faith in the Department of Justice and whether it can function independently when political pressures mount. What happens in courtrooms today could shape the standards of accountability for future leaders on both sides of the aisle.

Conclusion

James Comey, the former FBI Director, pleaded not guilty to two federal criminal charges related to alleged false testimony and obstruction. The charges stemmed from a grand jury indictment in Virginia following public calls for prosecution by President Trump. U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, formerly Trump’s lawyer, is leading the prosecution, prompting Comey’s team to challenge her appointment as unlawful. Trial proceedings are expected to begin on Jan. 5 and may include further legal motions over conduct by prosecutors and the grand jury. Comey’s daughter attended the arraignment in support, and critics from the legal community are raising alarms about broader threats to civil liberties and legal objectivity.

Related Posts

Written By: Rampart Stonebridge

I'm Rampart Stonebridge, a curious and passionate writer who can't get enough of true crime. As a criminal investigative journalist, I put on my detective hat, delving deep into each case to reveal the hidden truths. My mission? To share engaging stories and shed light on the complexities of our mysterious world, all while satisfying your curiosity about the intriguing realm of true crime.

CRIME NEWS

CRIME STORIES

U.S. Crime Newsletter

Receive information on new articles posted, important topics and tips.
Join Now
We won't send you spam. 
Unsubscribe at any time.

LATEST NEWS

Copyright © 2025 - U.S. Crime News | All Rights Reserved.
magnifier