According to an arrest affidavit, the episode began when deputies stopped their vehicles after spotting a baby rabbit on a rural road in Grant County. One unnamed deputy picked up the rabbit out of concern for its safety, fearing it might be harmed. Deputy Gomez, seen in a video that surfaced online, aggressively demanded the rabbit be given to him and allegedly used a Taser threat to force the handover.

Gomez reportedly swore on “his kids” he wouldn’t harm the animal, but seconds after it was handed over, he threw the rabbit with such force against a patrol vehicle that witnesses described hearing a “huge thud.” Other officers present were seen laughing as the rabbit was fatally injured. The animal was later euthanized to prevent further suffering, according to statements given to New Mexico State Police.

Shocking act filmed while others watched

A sergeant and a corporal from the department were reportedly present during the incident but did nothing to intervene. According to state police investigators, their failure to take action violates the New Mexico statute requiring officers to report and stop misconduct. Despite this, those supervisors remain employed and have not been placed on leave. Deputy Gomez, however, has been placed on leave pending the outcome of the criminal case. He is facing two charges -- one for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on a fellow peace officer and one for extreme cruelty to animals.

The official police statement did not indicate whether any future disciplinary action would be taken against the other officers involved. The Grant County Sheriff’s Office confirmed Gomez’s employment status but has made few additional comments on the internal handling of the case or whether current department procedures would change.

Previous conflict escalates behind scenes

This is not the first time Gomez is alleged to have shown concerning behavior involving the same deputy. A few hours after the rabbit incident, he reportedly pointed his firearm at the deputy from behind. Gomez later claimed he was only testing the light attached to his duty weapon.

In another prior incident, Gomez allegedly pointed a Taser at the same deputy after taking his phone. These confrontations raise additional questions about his conduct and whether supervisors in the department missed signs of aggression.

Gomez’s attorney, Gary Mitchell, maintains his client has done no wrong. “We don’t think he did anything wrong, obviously,” Mitchell said when reached for comment. “We’re waiting to see what evidence the state has. But it sounds like an inner-office situation that should not have turned into a criminal case.”

Public outrage grows

The video, which began circulating widely on social media platforms, has sparked strong emotional responses from viewers. “That’s so inhumane, and these are the people that are supposed to be protecting our community,” one user posted online.

Others called for justice and accountability, with one person writing, “I hope they are punished for that. Every single one of them!” A third called the situation simply "horrid." The outrage has intensified calls for police oversight and reform, especially in rural law enforcement environments where accountability can sometimes lapse.

The public anger centers not only on the abuse of the animal but also on the broader issue of officer misconduct, unchecked by department leadership. The laughter and inaction by other deputies during the incident have become key points in the outcry as community trust appears to be at risk.

Lessons to learn

1. Even seemingly minor actions can escalate to violence. What may start as a moment of levity in a field setting can turn deadly when rules and ethics are disregarded. Public servants, particularly those authorized to carry weapons, must be held to the highest behavioral standards.

2. Supervisors must act when misconduct occurs. When high-ranking officers fail to intervene or report improper behavior, it sends a message that such actions are tolerated. This can lead to a wide erosion of workplace accountability and public safety risks.

3. Do not ignore early red flags. This incident followed earlier altercations between the same deputies, raising concerns about department culture and the timeliness of administrative response. While crime can strike anyone despite best efforts, addressing behavioral concerns early is one way to contain future risk and protect others.

Why this story matters

This case is more than just a disturbing video — it’s a reminder of the responsibility public officials have toward their communities and each other. It underscores the need for robust oversight mechanisms within law enforcement agencies, particularly in isolated areas.

The public relies on officers to act with integrity and compassion, especially when a vulnerable life — human or animal — is involved. The continuation of this case will likely shape ongoing conversations around transparency, officer conduct, and reform.

Looking ahead

Nearly a year later, the fallout from the incident has yet to fully subside. Gomez awaits prosecution while remaining on paid administrative leave, and questions linger over whether other involved officers will face consequences. The Grant County Sheriff's Office has shared little about potential policy changes or future disciplinary reviews.

Meanwhile, those who viewed the video continue to express frustration, not only over the act itself but over the apparent indifference shown by the supervising officers present. The lack of intervention has intensified calls for clarity and transparency in how rural agencies handle misconduct among their ranks.

This tragic case shines a light on a wide range of issues — from the treatment of animals to officer accountability to the inner culture of a law enforcement agency. It’s now up to the courts and the sheriff’s office to show their commitment to justice.