Friday, July 4, 2025
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
CRIME NEWS     CRIME ANALYSIS     TRUE CRIME STORIES
/
 July 3, 2025

Teen babysitter denied pay over parents' disapproval of tank top

A heated controversy has erupted over a conservative Catholic family's attempt to withhold payment from their 15-year-old Jewish babysitter due to her choice of clothing. The incident has ignited discussions about religious discrimination and workers' rights on social media.

According to the Daily Mail, the teenage babysitter, identified only as Mae, had been caring for the family's two children for over a year before an incident involving her attire led to a payment dispute that has since gone viral on Reddit.

The controversy centered around Mae's decision to wear a Brandy Melville skylar stripe lace tank top underneath a sweatshirt while watching the children. She only removed the outer layer when the kids requested her participation in active play.

Religious Tensions Surface in Payment Dispute

The family, particularly the mother, Marianne, initially offered only $50 for seven hours of work, citing Mae's "inappropriate clothing" as justification for the reduced payment. The standard rate for the sitting job was $150.

When Mae politely inquired about the delayed payment via text message, she received a response that shocked many online observers. The parents expressed their discomfort with her attire and attempted to negotiate a significantly lower rate.

The situation became more complex when religious differences came to light. Mae revealed she was Jewish, while the family she worked for was Catholic, suggesting underlying tensions that had previously manifested in disagreements between the parents and Mae's mother.

Social Media Community Rallies Behind Teen

The Reddit community overwhelmingly supported Mae's position, with thousands of users condemning the family's actions. Many pointed out the legal and ethical implications of withholding agreed-upon wages.

Commenters specifically criticized the timing of the family's complaint, noting that if they had issues with Mae's clothing, they should have addressed it immediately rather than waiting until payment was due. The consensus was that working the full shift without complaint nullified any later objections.

Several users also highlighted the potentially discriminatory nature of the situation, particularly after Mae revealed the religious dynamic at play. The incident sparked broader discussions about workplace discrimination and fair labor practices.

Mother's Controversial Response Escalates Situation

When Mae's mother attempted to intervene by email, the situation deteriorated further. The family ignored the mother's communication, forcing Mae to continue advocating for herself.

Marianne's subsequent response included inflammatory comments about Mae's upbringing and her mother's influence. The exchange revealed deeper prejudices, with Marianne expressing hope that Mae would find "normality" despite her parents' influence.

The mother's response also included religiously charged language, suggesting she had been "praying" for Mae to develop differently from her parents, further emphasizing the religious undertones of the conflict.

Why this story matters

This story highlights the vulnerabilities faced by young employees, especially teenagers, when power dynamics are unbalanced. It serves as a cautionary tale about how personal bias and unspoken expectations can be used against someone performing honest labor. Teen workers, who often rely on informal agreements, must be treated with fairness and dignity.

Conclusion

In summary, Mae, a 15-year-old babysitter, worked a full seven-hour shift for a family she had served for over a year, wearing a tank top under a sweatshirt that she only removed at the children's request. Days later, the parents refused to pay her in full, citing the tank top as inappropriate. After she posted the story online and received widespread support, the parents ultimately paid the full amount but terminated their professional relationship with her.

Mae responded by ending the relationship on her terms, citing personal disrespect and religious tensions. The story continues to resonate as a powerful example of the need to respect young workers and ensure they are treated justly.

Related Posts

Written By: Rampart Stonebridge

I'm Rampart Stonebridge, a curious and passionate writer who can't get enough of true crime. As a criminal investigative journalist, I put on my detective hat, delving deep into each case to reveal the hidden truths. My mission? To share engaging stories and shed light on the complexities of our mysterious world, all while satisfying your curiosity about the intriguing realm of true crime.

CRIME NEWS

CRIME STORIES

U.S. Crime Newsletter

Receive information on new articles posted, important topics and tips.
Join Now
We won't send you spam. 
Unsubscribe at any time.

LATEST NEWS

Copyright © 2025 - U.S. Crime News | All Rights Reserved.
magnifier