Republican Senator Eric Schmitt has taken a bold stance against the Department of Justice, demanding transparency in its handling of former President Donald Trump's indictment.

According to The Daily Caller, Senator Schmitt of Missouri has addressed a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland requesting the release of internal communications related to Special Counsel Jack Smith's latest superseding indictment against Trump.

In his letter, Schmitt expresses deep concern over what he perceives as political decisions made by the DOJ in recent weeks. He criticizes both Smith's indictment in the classified documents case and the department's renewed focus on Russian election interference, viewing these actions as evidence of political weaponization.

Senator's Concerns Over DOJ's Recent Actions

Schmitt's letter to Garland highlights his disappointment with two specific decisions made by the Department of Justice. He argues that these choices appear to be poorly thought out and risk further politicizing the DOJ.

The Missouri Senator takes particular issue with the DOJ's approach to prosecuting political opponents, describing it as unprecedented in the nation's history. He emphasizes the problematic timing of these actions, noting that they are occurring while votes are being cast.

Schmitt also raises questions about the constitutional legitimacy of Jack Smith's appointment as special counsel, citing a previous dismissal of Smith's indictment against Trump in the classified documents case due to his "improperly appointed" status.

Calls for Transparency and Communication Records

In his letter, Senator Schmitt makes specific requests for information from the Department of Justice. He seeks any communications between DOJ officials and Jack Smith following two significant events.

Firstly, Schmitt requests records of interactions after the Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity. Secondly, he asks for communications that took place after Trump-appointed District Judge Aileen Cannon found Smith's appointment to be unconstitutional.

The Senator argues that if Smith's appointment is unlawful in one case, it should be considered unlawful in all cases he oversees. He expresses concern that the DOJ is disregarding the only judicial decision on the lawfulness of Smith's appointment.

Concerns Over Election Interference And Timing

Senator Schmitt's letter also addresses broader concerns about potential election interference. While affirming his stance against any foreign interference in U.S. elections, he expresses worry about the timing and nature of recent DOJ actions.

The Senator draws parallels between current events and past controversies, referencing the Mueller investigation and the Hunter Biden laptop saga. He suggests that the DOJ's recent moves might be an attempt to influence the upcoming 2024 election.

Schmitt specifically criticizes the decision to indict Trump just before mail-in ballots were sent out in key states. He likens this timing to the very kind of election interference that the DOJ claims to be combating.

Questions About Special Counsel's Authority

In his communication to Attorney General Garland, Senator Schmitt raises pointed questions about Jack Smith's authority and the appropriateness of his actions as special counsel.

The letter inquires whether Smith's most recent superseding indictment against Trump filed close to the election, could be considered misconduct or dereliction of duty. Schmitt suggests that such actions might provide grounds for Garland to remove Smith from his position.

Schmitt characterizes Smith's ongoing prosecution of Trump as "rabid" and "political" despite a federal judge's ruling against his constitutional authority to act. He argues that this situation has created a "miniature constitutional crisis."

Why This Story Matters

The implications of Senator Schmitt’s allegations are profound, suggesting a potentially dangerous blurring of lines between law enforcement and political strategy.

This situation underscores the necessity for transparency and accountability in governmental actions, particularly when they intersect with the foundational democratic process of elections.

The unfolding events will significantly influence public trust in the institutions that uphold the rule of law in the United States, making this a story of national importance.

Conclusion

Senator Eric Schmitt's letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland demands transparency from the Department of Justice regarding its handling of Trump's indictment. Schmitt expresses concerns about the DOJ's recent actions, questioning their timing and potential political motivations. The Senator calls for the release of internal communications and raises doubts about Special Counsel Jack Smith's authority, highlighting the need for accountability in the justice system.